“Ancient Armageddon”: How SEO Is Helping Archaeologists Debunk Conspiracy Theories

Posted by

The opinions expressed within this story are entirely the author’s and do not show the opinions and beliefs of SMM Panel or its affiliates.

You may have found out about “Ancient Apocalypse”, a series in which host Graham Hancock proposes questionable theories about the origins of ancient civilizations.

It invested a week trending in the global leading 10 on Netflix, accumulating around 24,620,000 watch hours in between November 14th and November 20th, 2022.

Netflix lends authority to the show by classifying it as a “docuseries,” and IMDB classifies it as a “documentary” and “history.”

However online, it’s been shrouded in controversy, and search algorithms might be satisfying good-faith reviews about the show from researchers and teachers– as some working archeologists have actually considered the show unverified pseudoscience at best, and dangerous misinformation at worst.

The Society For American Archaeology composed a letter to Netflix asking it to reclassify and contextualize the program, mentioning the host’s “aggressive rhetoric,” the show’s “incorrect claims,” and the associations that the theories presented have with “racist, white supremacist ideologies.”

But this is a story about the function SEO plays in the debate– how scientists and science communicators provide their reviews of the show, and how audiences discover them.

Browse algorithms get a lot of critiques for how they can be utilized to spread out false information.

But in this case, I’ve seen support for educators and researchers who have committed to pressing back on popular pseudoscience.

Developers Rebutting “Ancient Apocalypse” Get A Boost From SEO

I initially found out of the controversy from Buy YouTube Subscribers developer “History With Kayleigh,” who, while not a scholastic or certified archaeologist, develops instructional videos about ancient history and historical sites.

She communicated with Tweets from researchers who had actually reacted and “chose to try and write a reasonable counterclaim to the show,” as she told me.

Kayleigh’s video about “Ancient Apocalypse” isn’t the best-performing video on her channel. Still, it was absolutely carrying out above the average of her recent releases in a brief amount of time, at 67,000 views on December 1st.

Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December

2022 But then, I took another screenshot of the channel after the weekend, on December 5th

. Kayleigh launched a second video, and the first” Ancient Apocalypse: Truth Or Fiction?” had currently grown to 104,000 views

. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Kayleigh wasn’t the only developer to publish material about the Netflix series. Dr. Expense Farley, an archaeologist and associate professor at Southern Connecticut State University who runs a

small Buy YouTube Subscribers channel about archaeology in his free time, made one of the earliest Buy YouTube Subscribers videos critiquing Hancock and the program. And while his reach is much smaller sized, his videos about”Ancient Apocalypse” took off. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 Dr. Farley shared screenshots of his Buy YouTube Subscribers analytics, showing that

his first video about Graham Hancock drew more traffic than usual from Google searches. The below screenshots are from November 22nd, when

the video was still around 5,000 views. For that specific video, the” external”traffic source was around 28 %, compared to his channel average of around 10%. A third of that external traffic was from Google.

Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022< img src= "https://cdn.searchenginejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/unnamed-639a5869b100b-sej.png"alt=" A screenshot of YouTube channel"Archaeology Tube"internal analytics"/ > Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022

The following screenshot is the overall channel data for comparison. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November

2022 He likewise shared the search terms the video was performing best for within Buy YouTube Subscribers search. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 I checked in once again with his channel on December 5th. Screenshot from Buy YouTube Subscribers, December 2022 This first video still acquires most of its

traffic from search terms. External views on it were about 11% lower on December 5th than they were on November 22nd. This makes sense with publications picking up the story

and filling up online search engine results pages(SERPs ). Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube”Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 The second video has extremely different statistics, being pressed mainly by Buy YouTube Subscribers’s browse functions like recommended videos. Screenshot of internal analytics of the “Archeology Tube” Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022

This time, Buy YouTube Subscribers appears to have recognized the interest in a trending subject and pressed the video appropriately. In the first video that he made about”Ancient Archaeology, “Dr. Farley attended to Hancock directly with a review focusing on the relationship between the theories posed in the show, and white supremacy.

In the 2nd video, Dr. Farley focused on unmasking the specific frauds in the program.

He informed me, “There is a MARKED distinction in the responses to the two videos. In video # 1, I point out white supremacy and the history of Atlantean misconceptions with racism. That video has … hundreds of disparaging remarks [that] are misogynistic, racist, and homophobic.

The second video also has some comments like this, however many more positive comments or useful criticisms. This video simply spoke directly to some of the falsehoods in the program however does not straight attend to racism or white supremacy.”

Even with the unfavorable response, the reality stays that individuals seen and engaged with the video, as this screenshot of the video’s engagement statistics reveals.

Screenshot of internal analytics of the”Archeology Tube”Buy YouTube Subscribers channel, November 2022 One could argue that this is a fluke– which these apparently effective efficiency metrics are merely about profiting from a trending keyword.

However Buy YouTube Subscribers algorithms work differently from Google Search.

Buy YouTube Subscribers utilizes metadata about videos to estimate importance, however it likewise utilizes user engagement signals such as watch time to test the significance of videos to particular questions. Buy YouTube Subscribers’s leading ranking element is viewer fulfillment.

“History with Kayleigh” has a large following currently that likely offered her videos an increase. However Dr. Farley doesn’t have a large following, and the reach of his videos comes down to organic discovery.

People Look For Details About “Ancient Armageddon” And Discover Review

Other scientists, with little and big followings, have likewise seen uncommonly high traffic about this subject on other platforms.

Dr. Flint Dibble, an archaeologist at Cardiff University, composed a defense for The Discussion and kept in mind the popularity of the piece on Twitter:

Screenshot from Twitter, November 2022

I reached out to Dr. Dibble for his point of view. He mentioned: “I have actually gotten a wide range of actions to my thread. Lots of abuse, and plenty of appreciation. A number of people clearly discovered it while searching for more info on the program.

Some, especially within the very first week of release, discussed they were searching Twitter to discover responses to it either prior to viewing or mid-watch.

Individuals who discussed discovering the thread through a search were all grateful for quickly getting a clearer context for the show.”

He shared an example of a Twitter user who went searching for information about the show while they were enjoying it and valued the critique he posted on the platform:

Screenshot from Twitter, December 2022

Dr. Andre Costopoulos, an archaeologist at the University Of Alberta, blogged about the show on his individual WordPress blog and shared his blog analytics with me in late November.

The content he discussed “Ancient Apocalypse” became the best performing on his website in a matter of days, with Google Browse making up the clear majority of traffic.

Screenshot of internal analytics from archeothoughts.wordpress.com, November 2022

General, this isn’t a huge amount of traffic. What’s interesting here is how the material about the program compares to other content by this creator, especially because the site is reasonably little.

Dr. Costopoulos thinks that researchers can reach audiences starving for information if they learn the tools.

“Scientists can use these tools just as well as our pseudo-alters,” he informed me, “and often to better impact, since we really have evidence to support our claims.”

How SEO Can Be Used To Spread Out Misinformation

Search algorithms are hotbeds of misinformation.

Dissemination of conspiracies and misinformation has actually been a hot topic on many different platforms, from Buy YouTube Subscribers to Buy Facebook Verification Badge.

Google has been reckoning with misinformation and how finest to resolve it for many years.

People who market conspiracy theories and pseudoscience understand this. They’re skilled online marketers and writers, and they’re good at SEO.

That can make it a lot more challenging to interact good science than misinformation. Scientists have requiring tasks beyond marketing and publishing, and their conclusions are typically tough to communicate efficiently.

They’re not trained to do it, and academia is slow to adapt to digital trends.

That leads the way for a conspiracy theory to remove with little bit more than a good story and excellent marketing.

Dr. Farley stated: “By and big, I think academics have no idea how to do SEO (I’m just stumbling around in the dark myself), and misinformation folks are much, far better at it. Academics, honestly, don’t have the time to learn this stuff.

It would be truly cool if our universities would assist … but I’ve discovered the media departments at unis are very old school. If I brought this to them, they ‘d pitch a media statement to the local newspaper.

Our media department is great and has terrific intentions, but by and large, they’re early in the game on utilizing social media as a media tool.”

So we have a dilemma where scientists, who aren’t necessarily trained in communications and marketing, take on versus expert online marketers of concepts. And they’re doing it with individual enthusiasm projects on top of their existing jobs.

When it comes to natural reach, scientists require allies.

Is Review Of “Ancient Apocalypse” Having An Effect?

The results don’t seem as encouraging when you zoom out and take a look at the SERPs for “Ancient Armageddon.”

I opened an incognito window in Chrome and made sure my VPN was switched on (United States area), then searched for [ancient apocalypse]

The results here are a little bit of a mixed bag. The very first outcome is just a link to the program. That’s to be anticipated.

Instantly listed below are the video results. The 2nd video outcome appears to support the show. It had around 60,000 views when I took the screenshot. That’s a substantial amount of reach compared to the examples we looked at above.

The third video outcome has much less views however critiques the program.

We can also see, on the info panel, that the reviews from the scientific neighborhood might not be having a widespread impact. Audiences evaluate the show well.

Beneath the video results, we do see critiques from The Guardian and Slate. Let’s turn over to the news outcomes.

These are primarily reviews of the show released on large media platforms. Reporters are assisting researchers get their message out.

I checked in once again a couple of days later, using an incognito visitor Chrome browser with my VPN turned on (United States area). There was an interesting change in the SERP:

It looks like Google picked up on the debate and the newsworthiness of the search. The video outcomes were gone, changed by a “Top Stories” search feature that appears above the organic outcomes.

So, what’s the takeaway here?

Archaeologists Saw A Boost From SEO With Limited, But Important, Impact

Archaeologists did see an increase from SEO on this topic. However we can see from Google results that the program is popular, and the show’s advocates have a lot of traction too.

The limited result of this collective effort shows the difficulties dealing with science communicators. The impact of their review seems to be a drop in the pail compared to countless individuals who enjoyed the show.

However we should not mark down the success of these scientists and educators, either.

They’re constructing neighborhoods, offering details for people who look for it, and altering minds. When you look closely, you can plainly search algorithms rewarding these creators for their efforts.

Interested users do discover genuine scientific research study when they check out the series. The content is reaching individuals, and it’s motivating them to examine the show seriously.

This is encouraging news for the total quality of search.

I think marketers can assist here.

SEO specialists have the knowledge and resources to help amplify these messages. Maybe we could consider it a little bit of search social work.

More resources:

Featured Image: Elnur/SMM Panel